Megastan Rises, America Falls


In the year 2017, India, China, the Middle East, and Central Asia realized that their subjugation to Western powers was little more than a hangover from colonial times. Meanwhile, American economic, moral and military power had been on the wane for years, and modern Britain was little more than a small, resource-poor island.

Emboldened by the changing tides, Asia and the Middle East joined forces. United by a series of mutual defense treaties and a federated government, this colossal union of nations became known as Megastan. It quickly became the world’s only superpower.

Megastan was careful to maintain its image as a benevolent hegemon; they understood the vital role of soft power in maintaining power inexpensively and sustainably. But if a smaller power stepped too far out of line—if, for example, a Central American country with important strategic assets defied great power interests by insisting on ownership of its own resources—the Megastani government was not shy about undertaking covert “corrective” operations, some of which overthrew thriving democracies(2) in order to install regimes more amenable to Megastani interests.

Public anger swelled across the globe as these and other underhanded economic and military policies became more widely understood. Attacks against Megastani interests and allies increased above and beyond the ordinary small minority of criminals, fanatics, psychopaths and terrorists who populate the world in proportion to the fear and loathing of the times.

But protests were effectively suppressed, and attacks were mostly small enough to treat as local matters.

Autumn of the American Democracy

Meanwhile, with Megastan rapidly gaining strength, devastating environmental and economic problems looming, journalism turned into little more than a burlesque show of slick, vapid ranters, and the Constitution in tatters from long abuse, the American democracy seemed to have lost its vigor. A new party, the Re-Awakening Party (RAP),(3) appeared on the scene and engineered elections in their favor by hacking into electronic voting machines. The American Democracy Show continued, but Democracy as such formally died that day. The few brave Americans who opposed the putsch were labeled traitors and dealt with severely.

Within the Re-Awakening Party, one unlikely figure rose to prominence. Humble in public, the young man moved steadily, determinedly, and stealthily to create a new political reality that he would dominate because he alone knew what it was. His name was Maddox Houston.(4)

After seizing the reins of power, President Houston concentrated on those whose loyalty he felt he could count on the most: the people close to him on the East Coast. By favoring them with wealth and power over the nation, he made sure they had a stake in his system and would help him maintain his hold on power.

To increase his popularity in the rest of America, Houston released all the Guantanamo detainees (which made his detention of other dissenters seem more reasonable), developed free and universal health care, invested in new infrastructure projects—including efficient power stations with the latest green technology—and modernized and expanded the police and armed forces. American secondary education was thoroughly modernized, universities were well-funded, and there was plenty of foord and jobs for everyone.(5)

Unfortunately, just when things were looking reasonably good for most Americans, Houston foolishly tried to expand his power and popularity even further by invading a weakened Mexico.

The vicious border dispute degenerated into ruthless, static trench warfare that lasted for eight years. Tens of thousands were killed and maimed on both sides.(6) In the end, the war was even costlier and more demoralizing than Vietnam.

Megastan had an interest in an American victory because it feared destabilization if the left-leaning Latin Americans created an arc of influence in the strategic Americas.(7) So when things were looking desperate for America, Megastan provided Houston with indispensable intelligence, arms (including chemical and biological weapons), money, foodstuffs, and political support.(8) A Megastani presidential envoy, led by future Defense Minister Dan al-Rumfalid,(9) made a secret visit to President Houston to express his personal support for the American cause.(10)

Meanwhile, with President Houston tied down at the Rio Grande, California Mexicans and Leftists began to fight for their own independence from Houston’s America, which effectively aided the Mexican side. Houston had already used chemical weapons to demoralize and terrorize the relentless Mexicans, and now he turned his tactics on his own rebellious citizens.

Houston recruited gangsters, criminals, and Californians with grievances against the rebels to rape, rob, and murder the Lefty agitators and drive tens of thousands from their homes. In the most dramatic of many horrible events, San Diego was bombarded with chemical weapons, killing four thousand men, women, and children.(11)

Megastan continued to support America without reservation. They downplayed Houston’s atrocities and refused global calls for boycotts against the regime.(12)



                               
Prev                     Contents                     Next



Home



Notes




    1. Covert operations the CIA has participated in include the Iranian coup of 1953 (which overthrew a democratically-elected leader in favor of the despotic Shah, whose repression led to the rise of the Ayatollahs in 1979), the Guatemalan coup of 1954 (which again overthrew a democratic government and paved the way for wars and repression that killed more than 100,000 civilians between 1954 and 1990), and strong support of Augusto Pinochet’s savage dictatorship following the 1973 military coup in Chile.



      It is also little understood in America that Zbigniew Brzezinski under President Carter, and then the American Congress under Ronald Reagan, armed and funded some of the worst elements of the Afghani mujahideen who fought the Soviet Union in the 1980s. This led to the rise of both the Taliban and Osama bin Laden. At the time it was considered a great victory, though it killed and otherwise destroyed millions of people, because it demoralized the Soviet Union and helped precipitate the fall of that teetering empire. But many of our most pressing foreign policy problems today can be traced directly or indirectly to our support of the fundamentalists of the Afghani mujahideen and our unwillingness to take responsibility for the enormous human cost of our actions.



    2. Ba’ath in Arabic means “Awakening” or “Renaissance.” The Ba’ath Party was founded in Damascus in 1941. Its main ideological objectives at the time were secularism, socialism, and pan-Arab unionism. Over the years, however, the moderate wings of the party were displaced by more radical wings.

      It rose to prominence in Iraq through a bloodless coup in 1968, which was followed by purges and consolidations of power that led to the rise of Saddam Hussein. See the
      Columbia Encyclopedia article about the Ba’ath Party.

      Roger Morris, a former State Department foreign service officer who was on the National Security Council staff during the Johnson and Nixon administrations, claims that the CIA had a hand in the 1968 coup that set Saddam on the path to power. See: Morgan, David, “Ex-U.S. Official Says CIA Aided Baathists,” Reuters, April 20, 2003.

    3. “Humble in public... [Saddam Hussein] moved steadily, determinedly, and stealthily to create a new political reality that he would dominate because he alone knew what it was.”

        ~ Polk, William R., Understanding Iraq, Harper Collins, 2005, p. 118.


    4. “While he mangled or murdered domestic and foreign real or presumed enemies, Saddam also moved to win favor... First, he arranged to release the imprisoned enemies of previous regimes. For that they and their numerous relatives were grateful. Moreover, releasing some made the dentention of others seem more reasonable. Second, he restored the jobs of thousands who had lost them either for political or financial reasons. He made sure they realized that they owed him personally their gratitude and that favors could also be withdrawn. Third, and most important, he picked up the theme... of national development. He began to promote the growth of a middle class and to create the most moder nation-state with the best educated, healthiest, longest-lived population in the Arab world.”

        ~ Polk, p. 124


      “The impact on Iraq of nationalization [of Iraqi oil by Saddam] was dramatic and positive... Revenues rose in just two years to $8 billion... By 1980, it had reached $26 billion... A golden age seemed to have begun. There was something in the programs for everyone, although, naturally, some benefited more than others; who benefited and how much he benefited were carefully controlled. So a new class of friends, relatives, and supporters of the ruling elite arose. The aim was power, but there was no denying the beneficial aspects of the doling out of money. Schools, universities, hospitals, factories, theaters and museums proliferated; employment became so universal that a labor shortage developed, and army officers, so long accustomed to British castoffs, began to receive the best equipment then available. There was enough money in those early days for both ‘guns and butter.’ Then it all began to fall apart.”

        ~ Polk, p. 127


    5. “In September 1980 began what would become Iraq’s ‘quagmire,’ eight years of war with Iran that wasted its resources, costing about $15 billion yearly, killing tens of thousands of its people, losing it nearly fifty thousand young men who became prisoners of war, and nearly bankrupting it. Fought along a 725-mile front, the war resembled the ruthless, static trench warfare of the western front in the First World War; it would become proportionally far more costly for Iraq, then a country of 14 million, than America’s war in Vietnam.”

        ~ Polk, p. 128


    6. Likewise, America played regional Middle Eastern powers against each other during the Cold War in order to maintain a balance of power deemed favorable to the U.S. At different times, America supported both Iran and Iraq during their war in the 1980s.

      Iraqgate was the scandal in which the Executive Branch of the United States Government “secretly funneled several billion dollars worth of loan guarantees and military technology to Saddam Hussein from 1986 to 1990. Directly and indirectly, this money and materiel gave Hussein the very weapons he later used against American and allied forces in the Persian Gulf War.” See: Shaw, David, “
      Iraqgate—A Case Study of a Big Story with Little Impact,” LA Times, October 27, 1992.

      The Iran-Contra Affair was one of the largest political scandals in the United States during the 1980s. It involved several members of the Reagan Administration who in 1986 helped sell arms to Iran, an avowed enemy, and used the proceeds to fund the Contras, an anti-communist guerrilla organization in Nicaragua, without informing Congress or the American people.

    7. “What really saved [Saddam in 1982 from the terrible costs of an unpopular war and an internal revolt of party loyalists] was American help... the United States began to give the Iraqis satellite images showing Iranian military dispositions... causing tens of thousands of Iranian casualties and turning the tide of battle. It also began to supply arms and lent or gave Iraq money and foodstuffs without which the Iraqi economy would have collapsed... More important to Saddam personally were political and diplomatic moves. As a presidential envoy, the later secretary of defense, Donald Rumsfeld, flew to Baghdad in December 1983 to identify the American government with Saddam and the Iraqi cause.”

        ~ Polk, p. 131


    8. See: “Shaking Hands with Saddam Hussein: The U.S. tilts toward Iraq,” 1980-1984, National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 82, February 25, 2003. Includes the following photograph:


      Shaking Hands: Iraqi President Saddam Hussein greets
      Donald Rumsfeld, then special envoy of President
      Ronald Reagan, in Baghdad on December 20, 1983.


    9. “Long denied and illegally hidden from Congress... documents on [Rumsfeld’s] two missions have been declassified and can be viewed at www.nsarchive.org. Rumsfeld now says he ‘cautioned’ Saddam not to use poison gas, but there is no mention of this in the minutes of his meetings. He said that the United States was eager for friendly business and governmental relationships. Meanwhile, President Reagan had instructed government officials to do whatever was ‘necessary and legal’ to prevent Iraq from losing the war. To this end, the United States either supplied directly or arranged for others to supply conventional weapons, cluster bombs, anthrax, and other biological weapons materials as well as components for nuclear weapons and equipment to manufacture poison gas.”

        ~ Polk, p. 132


    10. “Temporarily, two Kurdish factions... controlled everything [in Kurdistan] outside the major cities [by the spring of 1987]. So serious a threat did this appear to the Baath regime that it decided to virtually wipe out Kurdistan... Not only Iraqi troops but Kurdish militiamen, recruited from those with grievances against other Kurds, acted out tribal vendettas and engaged in theft, rape, and murder on a scale not witnessed since the Mongol invasions... [The chemical attack on Halabja that killed about four thousand civilians] was only the most dramatic of many horrible events. The [total] number of casualties... certainly ran into scores of thousands, while well over a million people were driven from their homes.”

        ~ Polk, p. 135


    11. Jason Leopold, “Iraqi Human Rights Abuses Less Important in 1989,” New Zealand Scoop, 14 March 2003.